Review





Similar Products

93
DSMZ priestia megaterium
Validation of selected microbes with a mouse melanoma model (A) The workflow of B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice experiment. (B) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), P. <t>megaterium</t> + IgG ( n = 9), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 9), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (C) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of the experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 7), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 7), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (D) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells, and NK1.1 + NK cells and the expression of MHC-II and PD-L1 by CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages and CD11c + DCs shown as mean fluorescent intensity. n = 6–7 per group. (E) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green), IFN-γ (red), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green) and DAPI (blue) and FISH staining of B. cepacia or P. megaterium (red) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of CD8 in tumor nests ( n = 16 for bacteria-enriched nests and n = 16 for bacteria-poor nests pooled from four B16F10 tumor tissues, in the P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 or B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 group). (H) Relative mRNA expression of tumor CXCL9, CXCL10, PD-L1, CCL5, TNF-α, and PRF1 from B16-F10 bearing mice. n = 4–5 per group. (I) Immune cell subsets of CibersortX from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (J) Immune response-related signatures score from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (K) The workflow of A375 tumor-bearing huPBMC-C-NKG mice experiment. (L) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (M) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (N) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. n = 4 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B–D, G–J, and L–N). Statistics are analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B and L), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, D, H–J, M, and N), and unpaired parametric t test (G); ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also and .
Priestia Megaterium, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/priestia megaterium/product/DSMZ
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
priestia megaterium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

dsm  (DSMZ)
93
DSMZ dsm
Validation of selected microbes with a mouse melanoma model (A) The workflow of B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice experiment. (B) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), P. <t>megaterium</t> + IgG ( n = 9), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 9), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (C) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of the experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 7), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 7), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (D) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells, and NK1.1 + NK cells and the expression of MHC-II and PD-L1 by CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages and CD11c + DCs shown as mean fluorescent intensity. n = 6–7 per group. (E) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green), IFN-γ (red), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green) and DAPI (blue) and FISH staining of B. cepacia or P. megaterium (red) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of CD8 in tumor nests ( n = 16 for bacteria-enriched nests and n = 16 for bacteria-poor nests pooled from four B16F10 tumor tissues, in the P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 or B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 group). (H) Relative mRNA expression of tumor CXCL9, CXCL10, PD-L1, CCL5, TNF-α, and PRF1 from B16-F10 bearing mice. n = 4–5 per group. (I) Immune cell subsets of CibersortX from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (J) Immune response-related signatures score from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (K) The workflow of A375 tumor-bearing huPBMC-C-NKG mice experiment. (L) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (M) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (N) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. n = 4 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B–D, G–J, and L–N). Statistics are analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B and L), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, D, H–J, M, and N), and unpaired parametric t test (G); ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also and .
Dsm, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dsm/product/DSMZ
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dsm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
DSMZ priestia megaterium dsm 32
Validation of selected microbes with a mouse melanoma model (A) The workflow of B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice experiment. (B) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), P. <t>megaterium</t> + IgG ( n = 9), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 9), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (C) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of the experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 7), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 7), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (D) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells, and NK1.1 + NK cells and the expression of MHC-II and PD-L1 by CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages and CD11c + DCs shown as mean fluorescent intensity. n = 6–7 per group. (E) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green), IFN-γ (red), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green) and DAPI (blue) and FISH staining of B. cepacia or P. megaterium (red) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of CD8 in tumor nests ( n = 16 for bacteria-enriched nests and n = 16 for bacteria-poor nests pooled from four B16F10 tumor tissues, in the P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 or B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 group). (H) Relative mRNA expression of tumor CXCL9, CXCL10, PD-L1, CCL5, TNF-α, and PRF1 from B16-F10 bearing mice. n = 4–5 per group. (I) Immune cell subsets of CibersortX from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (J) Immune response-related signatures score from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (K) The workflow of A375 tumor-bearing huPBMC-C-NKG mice experiment. (L) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (M) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (N) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. n = 4 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B–D, G–J, and L–N). Statistics are analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B and L), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, D, H–J, M, and N), and unpaired parametric t test (G); ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also and .
Priestia Megaterium Dsm 32, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/priestia megaterium dsm 32/product/DSMZ
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
priestia megaterium dsm 32 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
DSMZ b megaterium
Validation of selected microbes with a mouse melanoma model (A) The workflow of B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice experiment. (B) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), P. <t>megaterium</t> + IgG ( n = 9), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 9), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (C) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of the experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 7), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 7), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (D) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells, and NK1.1 + NK cells and the expression of MHC-II and PD-L1 by CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages and CD11c + DCs shown as mean fluorescent intensity. n = 6–7 per group. (E) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green), IFN-γ (red), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green) and DAPI (blue) and FISH staining of B. cepacia or P. megaterium (red) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of CD8 in tumor nests ( n = 16 for bacteria-enriched nests and n = 16 for bacteria-poor nests pooled from four B16F10 tumor tissues, in the P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 or B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 group). (H) Relative mRNA expression of tumor CXCL9, CXCL10, PD-L1, CCL5, TNF-α, and PRF1 from B16-F10 bearing mice. n = 4–5 per group. (I) Immune cell subsets of CibersortX from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (J) Immune response-related signatures score from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (K) The workflow of A375 tumor-bearing huPBMC-C-NKG mice experiment. (L) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (M) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (N) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. n = 4 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B–D, G–J, and L–N). Statistics are analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B and L), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, D, H–J, M, and N), and unpaired parametric t test (G); ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also and .
B Megaterium, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/b megaterium/product/DSMZ
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b megaterium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

dsm319  (DSMZ)
94
DSMZ dsm319
P . megaterium strains examined in this study.
Dsm319, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dsm319/product/DSMZ
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dsm319 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cayman Chemical nile red 30787
P . megaterium strains examined in this study.
Nile Red 30787, supplied by Cayman Chemical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nile red 30787/product/Cayman Chemical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nile red 30787 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
DSMZ b megaterium strain
P . megaterium strains examined in this study.
B Megaterium Strain, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/b megaterium strain/product/DSMZ
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b megaterium strain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
DSMZ bacillus megaterium dsm 509
P . megaterium strains examined in this study.
Bacillus Megaterium Dsm 509, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bacillus megaterium dsm 509/product/DSMZ
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bacillus megaterium dsm 509 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Validation of selected microbes with a mouse melanoma model (A) The workflow of B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice experiment. (B) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 9), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 9), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (C) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of the experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 7), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 7), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (D) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells, and NK1.1 + NK cells and the expression of MHC-II and PD-L1 by CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages and CD11c + DCs shown as mean fluorescent intensity. n = 6–7 per group. (E) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green), IFN-γ (red), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green) and DAPI (blue) and FISH staining of B. cepacia or P. megaterium (red) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of CD8 in tumor nests ( n = 16 for bacteria-enriched nests and n = 16 for bacteria-poor nests pooled from four B16F10 tumor tissues, in the P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 or B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 group). (H) Relative mRNA expression of tumor CXCL9, CXCL10, PD-L1, CCL5, TNF-α, and PRF1 from B16-F10 bearing mice. n = 4–5 per group. (I) Immune cell subsets of CibersortX from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (J) Immune response-related signatures score from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (K) The workflow of A375 tumor-bearing huPBMC-C-NKG mice experiment. (L) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (M) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (N) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. n = 4 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B–D, G–J, and L–N). Statistics are analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B and L), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, D, H–J, M, and N), and unpaired parametric t test (G); ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also and .

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: Identification and validation of intratumoral microbiome associated with sensitization to immune checkpoint inhibitors

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102306

Figure Lengend Snippet: Validation of selected microbes with a mouse melanoma model (A) The workflow of B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice experiment. (B) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 9), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 9), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 8), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (C) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of the experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 8), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), P. megaterium + IgG ( n = 7), B. cepacia + IgG ( n = 7), C. kroppenstedtii + IgG ( n = 9), P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 ( n = 7), B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 9), and C. kroppenstedtii + anti-PD-1 ( n = 6). (D) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T cells, IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells, and NK1.1 + NK cells and the expression of MHC-II and PD-L1 by CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages and CD11c + DCs shown as mean fluorescent intensity. n = 6–7 per group. (E) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green), IFN-γ (red), and DAPI (blue) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 50 μm. (F) Representative images showing immunofluorescence staining of CD8 (green) and DAPI (blue) and FISH staining of B. cepacia or P. megaterium (red) in tumor tissues. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of CD8 in tumor nests ( n = 16 for bacteria-enriched nests and n = 16 for bacteria-poor nests pooled from four B16F10 tumor tissues, in the P. megaterium + anti-PD-1 or B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 group). (H) Relative mRNA expression of tumor CXCL9, CXCL10, PD-L1, CCL5, TNF-α, and PRF1 from B16-F10 bearing mice. n = 4–5 per group. (I) Immune cell subsets of CibersortX from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (J) Immune response-related signatures score from RNA-seq analysis of B16-F10 tumors. n = 4–5 per group. (K) The workflow of A375 tumor-bearing huPBMC-C-NKG mice experiment. (L) Tumor volume of mice measured every other day during the indicated treatment regimen; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (M) Tumor weight of mice measured at the end of experiment; PBS + IgG ( n = 4), PBS + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4), and B. cepacia + anti-PD-1 ( n = 4). (N) Flow cytometry analyses on the proportions of tumor-infiltrating IFN-γ + CD8 + T cells. n = 4 per group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B–D, G–J, and L–N). Statistics are analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (B and L), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (C, D, H–J, M, and N), and unpaired parametric t test (G); ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also and .

Article Snippet: Priestia megaterium , DSMZ , DSM: 32.

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Bacteria, RNA Sequencing, Comparison

P . megaterium strains examined in this study.

Journal: PLOS One

Article Title: Polyhydroxyalkanoate production in Priestia megaterium strains from glycerol feedstock

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322838

Figure Lengend Snippet: P . megaterium strains examined in this study.

Article Snippet: DSM319 , DSMZ , CP001982 , .

Techniques: